Another post that tries to refute the claim there is no difference between human beings and animals. (In my opinion, this 'idea' only has traction because of our socialist education system.)
- Perhaps the greatest difference between animals and humans is that humans have potential and animals do not.
- look at monkeys; we've known them at least 5000 years... and we've seen no progress at all. (Nor will we ever in my opinion.)
- compare this with the progress of human beings over this time.
- what I'm mainly referring to here is the educability of human beings vs. animals. (eg. a child taken from a primitive jungle tribe, who might otherwise have lived a simple life, can become with education a scientist. No animal can even begin to demonstrate the same potential.)
- Evolutionists who claim there is no difference between men and animals are utterly wrong; this is as fallacious an idea as there can be. (Surely no ape would be this foolish; this willfully hypocritical.)
- as far as I know, there is no animal potential movement. (As far as I know, no animals sit around dreaming about transcending themselves and becoming something else; as the clowns in the meta-human group do.)
Notes;
1. I wonder if there are any Abraham Maslows among the apes :=)
2. One wonders how, if animals show no potential (for leaps of progress) now, they somehow had this ability in the fog of the past.